In social studies, the students have been researching conflict zones as well as peace-building strategies.
This week, they participated in a negotiation simulation between a parent and a teenage child in Indian Kashmir trying to decide whether to move or stay.
During this activity, students had to assess and analyze their character's bio in order to determine his/her/their position (nonnegotiable) and interests (negotiable). They also had to think outside of the box to determine potential solutions and ways they could work together to build consensus and, eventually, compromise if needed.
No two simulations resulted in the same outcome, which speaks to how many different ways there are to build peace and interpret a situation. Some students made plans to emigrate. Some students made plans to relocate temporarily, some made plans to separate, and some made plans solely aligned with the parent's position, but drawing heavily on the child's interests.
The students reported using the following strategies during the negotiations:
- Listening to another perspective or point of view
- Listening carefully to hear what was not really being said
- Making it clear that a choice needed to be made
- Using logic to explain their position or understand the other side's position
- Conceding
- Compromising
- Being clear with their language